Contentious decision on school district merger

VOLNEY DUNAVAN - DUNAVAN@NETPTC.NET
Unification meeting
VOLNEY DUNAVAN
Joe Smith of Oakhurst asks the members of the Madera County Committee on School District Organization to be “reasonable and fair” in their decision about the composition of the board of trustees for the proposed district.

MADERA — In a unanimous vote, the Madera County Committee on School District Organization has agreed to recommend to the State of California Board of Education the joining together of Yosemite Joint Union High School District and Coarsegold Union Elementary School District. And thus begins a process that could result in an election on the issue sometime in 2006 or 2007.

Two issues are contentious regarding the recommendation which was based on a feasibility study prepared for the Committee by Geri Kendall Cox, Director of Business and Administrative Services for Madera County’s Office of Education.

Foremost was representation on the Board of Trustees for the newly formed district. Second was the choice to “opt out” of the unification plan by several of the “feeder” school districts in Eastern Madera County.

The members of the Madera County Committee chose to recommend a seven-member board for the new district. One member would come from each of the original five Yosemite High School feeder districts, and the remaining two, from Coarsegold which has been cited as the fastest growing area in Eastern Madera County.

A brief history
When the Yosemite Joint Union High School District was formed in 1974, there were five relatively small elementary school districts “feeding” students to the high school district: Bass Lake, Wasuma, Coarsegold, Oakhurst and Raymond-Knowles. Over time, Wasuma and Bass Lake merged with Oakhurst to form the Bass Lake Joint Union Elementary School District. This Bass Lake District, the Coarsegold Union Elementary School District and the Raymond-Knowles Union Elementary School District are the three in existence at this time.

In the fall of 2000, Coarsegold found itself in financial straits due to unexpected funding shortfalls, administrative illnesses and vacancies, and unanticipated liabilities. The trustees of Yosemite offered to work with both Coarsegold and the Madera Office of Education to help develop and implement a recovery plan.

In the 2001 business plan, Coarsegold was offered the option of contracting with Yosemite for part time administrative services as an alternative to recruiting and maintaining full time staff positions. This was agreed to and the contract was set for three years. In the following year the trustees of both the districts began to explore the possibility of unifying, thereby eliminating duplication of resources and efforts. Public hearings were held in September of this year [see SIERRA STAR September 3, 2003 “School unification public hearings”] and at that point a feasibility study was authorized.

The question as to whether the proposal would result in an equitable division of property and facilities does not apply since the recommendation is not to disband an existing district but rather to merge two districts. Additionally, Yosemite and Coarsegold would benefit from collective resources and the ability to apply for grants that are not possible without the unification.

To all the subsections, it was felt the proposed merger would satisfy requirements and not create prohibited situations. And then came the final subsection: Exceptional Circumstances.

The nitty-gritty
The state code provides that the county committee can take into consideration any exceptional circumstances or other appropriate criteria as it considers a petition for district reorganization.

The Madera County Committee requested information allowing it to make a recommendation on whether or not Raymond-Knowles and/or Bass Lake should be left out of the proposed unification. Further, the committee asked about leveling salary schedules if that might provide additional funds for enhancing educational opportunities for children in the new district. And finally, staff was requested to provide various scenarios for the composition of the board (should there be 5 or 7 members) and also the process for their election (by trustee area or at large).

The feasibility study indicates that the proposed unification would not adversely affect either the Raymond-Knowles and/or the Bass Lake districts, and their census is not needed to have adequate enrollment in the proposed new district. Indeed, the study indicates that with a growth rate of only 2 percent per year, the proposed unified district could be at 2,500 students by the 2006-2007 school year. And since students from Coarsegold already advance to Yosemite for high school, there should be no additional facilities required.

According to the study, “when there is a unification of districts with different Revenue Limits (RL), a new “blended” Revenue Limit is calculated.” Yosemite’s RL is approximately $900 higher than the RL for Coarsegold. The “blended” RL would be $5,453 which, after equalization of salaries and benefits for staff that would become employees of the new district, would leave $10.94 for each a.d.a. or average daily attendance. There is also additional funding available for small schools, but if the reorganized district has in excess of 2,500 students, it would not be eligible for the additional funding.

Most divisive is the issue of representation on the board of trustees for the new district. Yosemite and Coarsegold proposed a seven-member board with three trustees from the Bass Lake district territory, three from the Coarsegold area and one from the Raymond-Knowles district.

Joe Smith of Oakhurst was one of the two public members given time to comment during the proceedings. He urged that the trustee composition be selected by taxpayer base, in an attempt to be both reasonable and fair. Mr. Smith was not able to remain for the voting as he wanted to attend his child’s performance during a band concert in Oakhurst.

The board considered a five-member trustee board for the new district. That would provide one for each present “feeder” district and two at large. The feeling was that this would disenfranchise the Raymond-Knowles district. There was talk of the need for the voter and the parent to be able to connect with someone in his or her own area.

The final decision was that there be a trustee from each of the original “feeder” districts (Bass Lake, Wasuma, Coarsegold, Oakhurst and Raymond-Knowles) with two additional trustees from Coarsegold. This would create a seven-person board. It was also decided to recommend to the state that Bass Lake and Raymond-Knowles be allowed to opt out of the unification.

“That is not going to sit well,” said Mr. Smith in a late evening phone interview. “Coarsegold has been handed the keys to the high school.” Mr. Smith says that the action ignores the wishes of over 1,000 taxpayers who were fighting for fair representation in the soon-to-be-formed school district.

The state is presently operating at a 12- to 18- month backlog. The staff at the Department of Education will do an analysis of the proposal and set public hearings for Sacramento. If the proposal is approved, notice would be sent to Dr. Sally Frazier, the Madera County Superintendent, to call for an election for the issue to come before the voters.

In a separate action during the annual organizational meeting which was held prior to the organization meeting, Sara Wilkins was elected President of the Madera County Board of Education and Grant Sturm was elected its Vice President. Mr. Sturm represents Area 1 which covers portions of Golden Valley Unified, Chawanakee Unified, Bass Lake, and Yosemite Union High School Districts. Ms. Wilkins represents portions of Raymond, Bass Lake, Yosemite Union High and Coarsegold School Districts. She is also President of the California County Boards of Education for 2003.

Interestingly, the feasibility study refers in several places to the proposed Minarets High School that the Chawanakee Unified School District is hoping to build at the intersection of Hwy. 41 and North Fork Road [200]. It acknowledges that in fact, Yosemite Lakes Park might well identify more with a Minarets high school than with Yosemite and opines that as many as 200 students could be attracted to the proposed new school. A school bond measure will appear on the March 2004 ballot, to provide needed funds for the new school.

Chawanakee has until June of 2008 to build the school and have it up and running. If that is not accomplished, it will lapse as a district and most likely would be merged with Yosemite. Suffice to say, one might consider that to be the perfect time for the Madera County Committee on School District Organization to decide to take a look at Eastern Madera County in its entirety.

As a final note, in the lobby of the Madera County Office of Education hang two plaques. One is titled “Mock trial championship teams” and shows Madera High School winning in 1986, 1987 and 1988. Every year since then, including 2003, the winning school is Yosemite High School. And the second plaque lists the Academic Decathlon Championship Team: 1995 through and including 2003 is Yosemite High School. No one is questioning the education of the Yosemite students, only how their board of trustees will be selected.


Previous Sierra Star Article